- What does the safety score measure?
- Four things: what powers the deployer kept (45%), how much liquidity is actually in the pool (25%), any transfer tax or fee (15%), and whether trading is genuinely two-sided (15%). It is a contract and market-structure check. It is not a prediction, and it says nothing about whether a token will go up.
- Why do some findings cap the score outright?
- Two do: a blocked sell path, and an authority that can rewrite holder balances. No amount of liquidity or volume compensates for either, so they cap the headline number rather than being averaged away.
- Why are so few tokens listed?
- Two filters. Pools below $5,000 of liquidity are not indexed at all, and any token the security upstream has not indexed yet is dropped rather than shown as unknown. A radar that lists tokens it could not check is worse than one that lists fewer.
- Why do you rewrite some token names?
- Because some are crafted to deceive. A name can carry an invisible right-to-left override that makes it render as something it is not, or swap a Latin letter for an identical-looking Cyrillic one to impersonate a known token. Names are stripped of invisible characters before they reach the page, mixed alphabets are flagged, and a hidden-character name caps the score outright.
- Can a high score still go to zero?
- Yes, easily. A clean contract with deep liquidity can still be abandoned, dumped by its largest holders, or simply fail. The score tells you what can be checked automatically, which is a floor, not a recommendation.