Breakout vs FundingPips
Breakout
#7 overall
compared with
FundingPips
#3 overall
| Attribute | Breakout | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | Overall score | 7.7 |
| #7 | Rank | #3 |
| Trailing (intraday) | Drawdown | Static |
| 12% | Max drawdown | 8% |
| 6% | Daily drawdown | 4% |
| 10% | Profit target | 8% |
| 1-step | Steps | 2-step |
| None | Minimum days | 3 |
| No | Consistency rule | No |
| 80% | Split at funding | 90% |
| 14 days | Payout every | 14 days |
| $499 | Fee per $100k | $439 |
| 3 | Companies named | 3 |
| 1 | Platforms | 3 |
The short version
FundingPips takes it overall on 7.7 against 5.3 — cheapest static-drawdown challenge in the directory. Breakout is the better pick if what you need is a different market or platform.
One caution on reading the table: Breakout and FundingPips refuse our requests, so their rules were never read where they are published. That is scored openly as the evidence component, and the guide explains what it does and does not mean.
Both firms sell access to a simulated account rather than a financial service, so neither holds a licence anywhere — Breakout contracts from the United States and FundingPips from the United Arab Emirates.