FundingPips vs Topstep
FundingPips
#3 overall
compared with
Topstep
#6 overall
| Attribute | FundingPips | Topstep |
|---|---|---|
| 7.7 | Overall score | 6.2 |
| #3 | Rank | #6 |
| Static | Drawdown | Trailing (EOD) |
| 8% | Max drawdown | 4% |
| 4% | Daily drawdown | 2% |
| 8% | Profit target | 6% |
| 2-step | Steps | 1-step |
| 3 | Minimum days | 2 |
| No | Consistency rule | Yes |
| 90% | Split at funding | 90% |
| 14 days | Payout every | 7 days |
| $439 | Fee per $100k | $1090 |
| 3 | Companies named | 1 |
| 3 | Platforms | 3 |
The short version
FundingPips takes it overall on 7.7 against 6.2 — cheapest static-drawdown challenge in the directory. Topstep is the better pick if what you need is a different market or platform.
One caution on reading the table: FundingPips refuses our requests, so its rules were never read where they are published. That is scored openly as the evidence component, and the guide explains what it does and does not mean.
Both firms sell access to a simulated account rather than a financial service, so neither holds a licence anywhere — FundingPips contracts from the United Arab Emirates and Topstep from the United States.